Do Beautiful People Really Earn More Money?

The title of Catherine Hakim's book, "Honey Money: The Power of Erotic Capital" is causing quite a stir. The expression is supposedly used by Jakarta prostitutes and alludes to here to underline her belief that all women should be exploiting their erotic charms to get ahead.

(The Economist) The line of beauty

Pretty people still get the best deals in the market, from labour to love

Aug 27th 2011 | from the print edition

Beauty Pays: Why Attractive People are More Successful. By Daniel Hamermesh. Princeton University Press; 216 pages; $24.95 and £16.95. Buy from,

The Beauty Bias: The Injustice of Appearance in Life and Law. By Deborah Rhode. Oxford University Press USA; 272 pages; $17.95 and £15.99. Buy from,

Honey Money: The Power of Erotic Capital. By Catherine Hakim. Allen Lane; 304 pages; £20. To be published in America in September as “Erotic Capital: The Power of Attraction in the Boardroom and the Bedroom” by Basic Books; $26. Buy from,

FRANCE looked back this week at the 1911 theft of the Mona Lisa from the walls of the Louvre. It was one of the most startling art heists in history, but the emotions it still arouses go beyond that. Stealing Leonardo da Vinci’s painting was like stealing beauty itself. And beauty has lost none of its power to bewitch, bother and get its own way, as three new books on the economic advantages of good looks confirm.

Physically attractive women and men earn more than average-looking ones, and very plain people earn less. In the labour market as a whole (though not, for example, in astrophysics), looks have a bigger impact on earnings than education, though intelligence—mercifully enough— is valued more highly still.

Beauty is naturally rewarded in jobs where physical attractiveness would seem to matter, such as prostitution, entertainment, customer service and so on. But it also yields rewards in unexpected fields.

(Read more here)

Also see Are Pretty People More Selfish?, Can You Be Too Sexy to Work?, Are Beautiful People More Politically Extreme? and The Tiger Woods Effect

Be first to comment